In a proactive move to address potential security threats, the Mumbai Police has enforced Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure from December 20, 2023, to January 18, 2024. This decision comes in response to intelligence inputs warning of potential terror strikes, particularly targeting VVIPs, during the festive season.
As Mumbai gears up for Christmas and New Year celebrations, the restrictions imposed under Section 144 aim to ensure public safety without dampening the festive spirit. One of the key measures includes a ban on the assembly of four or more persons, a crucial step to prevent large crowds that could be vulnerable to security risks.
A notable aspect of the order is the prohibition on the flying of drones, remote-controlled microlight aircraft, paragliders, para motors, hand gliders, and hot air balloons over the city for the next 30 days. The rationale behind this restriction lies in the concern that these aerial objects could be exploited by terrorist and anti-national elements to carry out attacks, specifically targeting VVIPs and posing a threat to public safety.
The Mumbai Police clarified that exceptions to the ban on flying objects exist for aerial surveillance conducted by the police or under specific written permission from the deputy commissioner of police (operations). This strategic approach allows for necessary surveillance while maintaining stringent control over potential security threats.
The enforcement of Section 144 is justified by the police based on the belief that terrorists and anti-national elements might leverage drones, paragliders, and similar devices in their attacks, posing a risk not only to VVIPs but also to the general public. The preventive order becomes imperative to curb any potential misuse of these technologies and safeguard the metropolis.
Furthermore, the police emphasize the possibility of VVIPs being targeted, indicating that terrorist elements could endanger lives, destroy public property, and disrupt law and order in the city. The gravity of the situation is underscored by the stringent penalty outlined under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code for those found violating the order.
Despite these security measures, Dolphy D’Souza of the Bombay Catholic Sabha assures that the order will not hinder Christmas celebrations. This balancing act between security concerns and preserving the festive spirit reflects the careful consideration taken by authorities to ensure both safety and public enjoyment during this holiday season.
In conclusion, the imposition of Section 144 by the Mumbai Police is a proactive response to potential security threats, emphasizing the need for vigilance and precautionary measures during the festive season. While restrictions are in place to mitigate risks, efforts have been made to strike a balance that allows for celebrations to proceed while maintaining the safety and well-being of the public.
Surjitt Sahani
