Supreme Court refuses to entertain PIL on religious conversions

921224-supreme-court.jpg

Supreme Court refuses to entertain PIL on religious conversions

The Supreme Court on Friday said that people are free to choose their own religion, even as it lashed out at a public interest petition claiming there is mass religious conversion happening “by hook or by crook” across the country.

Instead, a Bench led by Justice Rohinton F. Nariman said people have a right under the Constitution to profess, practise and propagate religion.

“Why should a person above 18 years not choose his religion? What kind of a writ petition is this? We will impose heavy costs on you… Withdraw it or argue and risk the consequences,” Justice Nariman asked petitioner-advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

Justice Nariman reminded Mr. Upadhyay of the fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution to freely profess, practise and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality and health. “Why do you think there is the word ‘propagate’?’” Justice Nariman asked the petitioner.

Religious conversion is being done through a “carrot-and-stick” approach, Mr. Uapdhyay had claimed in his petition.

Surjitt Sahani

Share this post

scroll to top
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial